Two Simple Methods To Analyze Design Flood Hydrograph Using Discharge Data Only: Study Case Rhone Downstream

Authors

  • Samuel Jonson Sutanto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32679/jsda.v11i2.107

Abstract

Hilir sungai Rhone mempunyai berbagai macam permasalahan dalam bidang sumber daya air dengan salah satu diantaranya adalah banjir. Permasalahan banjir dapat diatasi dengan adanya perencanaan yang baik dan pekerjaan pengendalian banjir, akan tetapi kegiatan penanggulangan banjir memerlukan data hidrograf banjir rencana dimana data tersebut sangat sulit diperoleh. Metode yang sangat umum digunakan untuk mendapatkan hidrograf banjir rencana, misalkan metode hujan-limpasan, memerlukan data hidrologi yang cukup banyak. Oleh karena itu dalam makalah ini akan ditampilkan perbandingan dari dua buah metode untuk mendesain hidrograf banjir rencana dengan cara yang mudah dan memerlukan data yang sedikit. Dua buah metode tersebut adalah metode grafis dan metode hidrograf banjir sintetik. Hasil analisis dari kedua buah metode tersebut menunjukkan bahwa kedua metode tersebut mudah digunakan, sederhana dan hanya memerlukan data debit. Perbandingan dari kedua metode tersebut menunjukkan bahwa metode grafis memberikan hasil yang lebih baik daripada metode hidrograf banjir sintetik baik dari segi bentuk dan puncak hidrograf banjir.

References

Chow V.T, 1964. Handbook of applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill.

Cunderlik J.M., and Ouarda T.B.M.J, 2006. Regional flood-duration-frequency modeling in the changing environment. Journal of Hydrology 318: 276-291.

Eyrolle F., Antonelli C., Duffa C., and Rolland B. 2005. The extreme flooding of the Rhone Valley in December 2003 (South East France): consequences on the translocation of sediments and the associated contaminants over the flooded area. Material and Geoenvironment, Vol. 52, No. 1, 25-29.

Fopen J.W., Nonner J., and Wenninger J. 2010. Hydro(geo)logical Fieldwork Digne les Bains Field Manual. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands.

Grimaldi S., Petroselli A., and Serinaldi F. 2012. Design hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds: continuous simulation method versus event-based approach. Hydrological Processes, 26, 3124-3134, doi:10.1002/hyp.8384.

Grimaldi S., Serinaldi F., Napolitano F., and Ubertini L. 2005. A 3-copula function application for design hyetograph analysis. IAHS-AISH Publication, 293, 203-211.

Helsel D.R., and Hirsch R.M. 2002. Statistical method in water resources. Book 4, hydrologic analysis and interpretation, USGS, September 2001, USA.

Javelle P., Ouarda T.B.M.J., Lang M., Bobee B., Galea G., and Gresillon J. 2002. Development of flood regional duration frequency curves based on the index flood method. Journal of Hydrology 258, p. 249-259.

Keifer J.C., and Chu H.H. 1957. Synthetic Storm Patterns for Drainage Design. Journal of Hydraulics Division 83.

Maione U., Mignosa P., and Tomirotti M. 2003. Regional estimation of synthetic design hydrographs. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1:2, 151-163, doi:10.1080/15715124.2003.9635202.

Maione U., Mignosa P., and Tomirotti M. 2001. Synthetic design hydrograph for river flood management. XXIX IAHR congress proceedings, p.368, Beijing, China, 16-21 September 2001.

Nnadi F.N., Kline F.X., Wary H.L., and Wanielista M.P. 1999. Comparison of design storm concepts using continuous simulation with short duration storms, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 31(1), 61-85.

Puslitbang Air. 2008. Penelitian pengendali daya rusak air. No.IP.0101/05/La-HITA/2008. Puslitbang air, Bandung, Indonesia.

Snedecor G.W., and Cochran W.G. 1989. Statistical Methods, Eighth Edition, Iowa State University Press.

Singh V.P., Wang S.X., and Zhang L. 2005. Frequency analysis of nonidentically distributed hydrologic flood data. Journal of Hydrology 307 (2005) 175-195, Elsevier Publication.

Tu Min. 2006. Assessment of the effects of climate variability and land use change on the hydrology of the Meuse river basin. Ph.D Thesis, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands.

U.S. Water Resources Council. 1982. Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency. Bulletin 17 B, Hydrology Committee, Washington, D.C.

Verhoest N.E.C., Vandenberghe S., Cabus P., Onof C., Meca-Figueras T., and Jameleddine S. 2010. Are stochastic point rainfall models able to preserve extreme flood statistics? Hydrological Processes, 24, 3439-3445.

Welch B.L. 1947. The generalization of "Student's" problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34 (1–2): 28–35, doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28.

De Laat P.J.M. 2001. Workshop in hydrology. Lecture note HH275/01/1, IHE, Delft, the Netherlands.

Anonym. 2005. Peak discharge of the December 2003 Rhone flood at Beaucaire. Consensus conference, Lyon 26-28 July 2005, Final report.

Downloads

How to Cite

Sutanto, S. J. Two Simple Methods To Analyze Design Flood Hydrograph Using Discharge Data Only: Study Case Rhone Downstream. JURNAL SUMBER DAYA AIR, 11(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.32679/jsda.v11i2.107

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2015)

Section

ARTIKEL

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish in Jurnal Sumber Daya Air agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).