A comparison of discharge hydrograph using some methods of effective rainfall approach (case study: Upper Cisadane Watershed)

Authors

  • Orita Mega Delani Geofisika dan Meteorologi Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
  • Bambang Dwi Dasanto Geofisika dan Meteorologi Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32679/jsda.v12i2.65

Keywords:

effective rainfall, Green and Ampt Loss Method, Initial and Constant Rate Loss Method, SCS-CN

Abstract

Calculation of effective rainfall is an important step in hydrologic modelling. The used methods to calculate effective rainfall rarely observe watershed conditions on site. The objectives of the study is to determine the optimum method in calculating effective rainfall based on infiltration approach in Upper Cisadane Watershed and to analysis dominant characteristic of watershed on selected method. SCS-CN, Initial and Constant Rate Loss Method, and Green and Ampt Loss Method were the methods that used to estimate run off value in Upper Cisadane Watershed. The simulation was performed using HEC-HMS and tested using EF and RMSE on peak discharge and volume of hydrograph. The three events of peak discharge was chosen. Based on EF and RMSE test, Green and Ampt Loss Method model showed that simulated hydrograph was similar to measured hydrograph in Upper Cisadane Watershed with EF was 0.764 and RMSE was 5.93 m3/s. Based on the analysis, green and Ampt method is recommended to use on watershed with mountainous topographic and simillar on shape with Upper Cisadane Watershed.

References

Abood MM, Mohammed TA, Ghazali AH, Mahmud AR, Sidek LM. 2012. Impact of Infiltration Methods on the Accuracy of Rainfall-Runoff Simulation. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4(12): 1708-1713.

Asdak Chay. 2014. Hidrologi dan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai. Yogyakarta (ID): Gajah Mada University Press.

Chu X, ASCE A M dan Steinman A. 2009. Event and Continuous Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS. J Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 135 (1) : 119-124.

Emilda A. 2010. Dampak Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Terhadap Respon Hidrologi DAS Cisadane Hulu. Thesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Maca P. 2003. Movement of Rainfall Events in Prague Area. J Hydrol Hydromech 51(2): 144–149.

Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models. Part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10 (3): 282–290.

Nilda. 2014. Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Dampaknya terhadap Hasil Air di Daerah Aliran Sungai Cisadane Hulu. Thesis. Denpasar (ID): Universitas Udayana.

Petra KC. 2011. Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering. Oxford (UK): Alpha Science International Ltd.

Rawls WJ, Shalaby A, Mc Cuen RH. 1981. Evaluation of Methods for Determining Urban Runoff Curve Numbers. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24 (6): 1562-1566.

Risyanto. 2007. Aplikasi HEC-HMS untuk Perkiraan Hidrograf Aliran di DAS Ciliwung Bagian Hulu. Skripsi. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Saleh A, Ghobad R dan Noredin R. 2011. Evaluation of HEC-HMS Methods in Surface Runoff Simulation (Case study: Kan watershed, Iran). Adv Environ Biol 5(6): 1316-1321.

Sardoii ER, Noredin R, Shahram KS dan Somaieh T. 2012. Calibration of Loss Estimation Methods in HEC-HMS for Simulation of Surface Runoff (Case Study: Amirkabir Dam Watershed, Iran). Adv Environ Biol 6(1): 343-348.

Setioputro S. 2016. Identifikasi kualitas Sub Das Cisadane Hulu dengan Parameter Perubahan Tutupan Lahan dan Debit Air. Skripsi. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Shaw EM, Beven KJ, Chappell NA dan Lamb R. 2011. Hydrology in Practice. New York (US): Spon Press.

Šraj M, Dirnbek L dan Brilly M. 2010. The Influence of Effective Rainfall on Modeled Runoff Hydrograph. J Hydrol Hydromech 58(1): 3–14.

US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. 1994. Engineering and Design Flood-Runoff Analysis: Engineer Manual. 1110-2-1417 [internet]. [diunduh 2 Februari 2016]. url: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms.

US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. 2000. HEC-HMS Hydrologic Modelling System: User’s Manual. Version 4.0. [internet]. [diunduh 2 Februari 2016]. Tersedia pada: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms.

USDA-Soil Conservation Service. 1985. National Engineering Handbook. Section 4. Washington D C (US): Natural Resources Conservation Services.

USDA-Soil Conservation Service. 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watershed. Washington D C (US): Natural Resources Conservation Services.

Viessman W. 1977. Introduction to Hydrology 3rd edition. New York (US): Harper & Row.

Viji1 R, Ilangovan R dan Prasanna PR. 2015. Green-Ampt Runoff Model for the Ungauged Kundahpallam Watershed, Nilgiris, Western Ghats of India. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 10 (51).

Zema DA, Antonino L, Domenico M dan Santo MZ. 2016. Comparing Different Infiltration Methods of the HEC-HMS Model: The Case Study of the Mésima Torrent (Southern Italy). Land Degrad Develop.

Published

2015-11-01

How to Cite

Delani, O. M., & Dasanto, B. D. (2015). A comparison of discharge hydrograph using some methods of effective rainfall approach (case study: Upper Cisadane Watershed). JURNAL SUMBER DAYA AIR, 12(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.32679/jsda.v12i2.65

Issue

Section

ARTIKEL

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)