The Changing Society And The Role of Indonesia Defense University As Country Defense Axis

Authors

  • Aris Arif Mundayat Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v4i1.249

Abstract


This study discusses the concept of defending the country in by considering the context of the development of Indonesian society in the global era and democracy. The diversity of consciousness that arise therefore, are challenge for Indonesia. This qualitative research-based study found that the various phenomena mentioned above are essentially challenge to the interests of the state because they de territorialize the logic of state territorialism, through the form of postnationalist logical thinking. This study is an attempt to define the role of the Indonesian Defense University to form the Axis of State Defense as a strategic network to respond the dynamic of socio-political consciousness constructively. This study contributes a number of important academic concepts to be discussed and further developed.

Keywords: Defense the country;  Ideology; Globalization, Faithology; Post-nationalist 

References

Althusser, L. (1971).â€Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses†in Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. pp. 121–176. Translated from the French by Ben Brewster (2001). New York: Monthly Review Press. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity al large: cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). U of Minnesota Press. Bates, R. H. (1983). Modernization, ethnic competition, and the rationality of politics in contemporary Africa. State versus ethnic

Jurnal Pertahanan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018)

claims: African policy dilemmas, 152, 171.. Bayat, A. (2005). Islamism and social movement theory. Third World Quarterly, 26(6), 891-908. Bereday, G. Z., & Lauwerys, J. A. (Eds.). (2013). World Yearbook of Education 1965: The Education Explosion. London: Routledge. Clough, P. T. (2007). Introduction to The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, ed. Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007), 18, 84. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Sage Publications, Inc. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge : Selected interviews and other writings, 19721977. Pantheon.. Edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1991). Trans. Sheridan A. Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin. Hadiz, V. R. (2016). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Hobsbawm, E. J. (2012). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge University Press.

Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Univ of California Press. Kurtz, P. (2008). Forbidden Fruit: The Ethics of Secularism. New York: Prometheus Books. Martin, E. (2013). The potentiality of ethnography and the limits of affect theory. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), S149-S158.. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press. McDermid, D. (2006). The Varieties of Pragmatism: Truth, Realism, and Knowledge from James to Rorty. London and New York: Continuum. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage. Mouffe, C. (2002). Politics and Passions: The Stakes of Democracy. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson education. Rabinow, P. (Ed.) (1991) The Foulcault Reader: An introduction to Foulcault’s thought, London: Penguin.

Jurnal Pertahanan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018) 23

Shook, J. & Margolis, J. (Eds.) (2006). A Companion to Pragmatism. Oxford: Blackwell. Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Duke University Press.

Trevor-Roper, H. (1983). The Invention of Tradition: The Highland Tradition of Scotland. In The Invention of Tradition. (Eds). Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 198

Downloads

Published

2018-04-12

How to Cite

Mundayat, A. A. (2018). The Changing Society And The Role of Indonesia Defense University As Country Defense Axis. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian Dan Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism Dan Integrity, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v4i1.249

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of articles accepted for publication is assigned to the Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity and Indonesia Defense University (Universitas Pertahanan) as publishers of the journal. The intended copyright includes the rights to publish articles in various forms (including reprints).

Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity keep the rights to articles that have been published. Authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the DOI Number or the link of our journal's website. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from our journal and/or Indonesia Defense University (Universitas Pertahanan) with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.