The Empowerment of Defense Areas in a Changeover Perspective

Authors

  • Indria Samego Pusat Penelitian Politik LIPI, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v1i3.76

Abstract

In accordance with the keyword in this article, “contextualisationâ€, this article examines the problem of state defence system in the dynamic and contextual perspective. Taking in consideration the existing structural environment changes, related legislations and their implementations should be updated from time to time. This is very important not only for decision makers but also for all related stakeholders.. When non-military power plays a greater role in determining the country’s defence posture, defence planners would have to shift their attention from hard power calculations to diplomacy and the development of other elements of soft power

References

Constitution of The Republic Indonesia

Article 1 para 1 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article 1 para 2 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article 1 para 6 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article 1 para 7 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article 21 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article 3 para 2 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article 8 para 2 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Article22 para 1 Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Barany, Z. (2015). Exits from Military Rule: Lessons for Burma. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 26 No. 2. pp. 86-100. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2015.0024

Buzan, B. (2008). People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Oxford: ECPR Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage publications

Law Number 20 Year 1982 on State Defence Basics

Law Number 3 Year 2002 on State Defence

Lee, T. (2000). The nature and future of civil-military relations in Indonesia. Asian Survey, 40(4), 692-706. DOI: 10.2307/3021189

Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2013). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. NewYork: PearsonEducation

Sebastian, L. C., & Gindarsah, I. (2013). Assessing military reform in Indonesia. Defense & Security Analysis. Vol. 29 No. 4. pp. 293-307. DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2013.842709

Sukma, R., & Prasetyono, E. (2003). Security sector reform in Indonesia: The Military and the Police. La Haye, Netherland Institute of International Relations “Clindengaelâ€, février, disponible sur< http://www. clingendael. nl/cru/pdf/working_paper_9. PDF.

Supriatma, A. M. T. (2013). TNI/POLRI in West Papua: how security reforms work in the conflict region. Indonesia. Vol. 95 No. 1. pp. 93-124. DOI: 10.1353/ind.2013.0002

Susetyo, H., SH, L., & SI, M. (2008). Menuju Paradigma Keamanan Komprehensif Berperspektif Keamanan Manusia Dalam Kebijakan Keamanan Nasional Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica (Journal of Law), 6.

Tremblay, L. B. (2014). An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(4), 864-890. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou060.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-08

How to Cite

Samego, I. (2015). The Empowerment of Defense Areas in a Changeover Perspective. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian Dan Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism Dan Integrity, 1(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v1i3.76

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check